|
 |
Whitaker Lab |
|
 |
Services |
|
 |
Professional Engineers
|
|
 |
Environmental
Services |
|
 |
Senior Lab Technicians |
|
 |
Professional Geologist |
|
 |
Industry News |
|
 |
Employment
Opportunities |
| |
Construction Materials
Testing at Whitaker Laboratory Includes: |
| |
 |
Soils |
| |
 |
Concrete |
| |
 |
Masonry |
| |
 |
Asphalt |
| |
Geotechnical Foundation Engineering |
| |
Soil Borings Site
Investigations
|
| |
Environmental Phase I
& II Site Assessments
|
| |
Fuel Site Surveys
|
| |
Rebar &
Pile Inspections
|
| |
Mold &
Asbestos Surveys |
| |
NPDES
Stormwater Monitoring |
| |
|
| |
Low Strain Dynamic Testing
Wave propagation theory can also be applied
to situations where a light impact is applied to a pile,
resulting in a low strain. A compression wave will still
travel down the pile when it is impacted by a small hand held
hammer. Much like in High Strain Testing, this wave will
travel at a constant speed c. Changes in pile impedance Z
produce wave reflections.
The application of the wave equation theory
to waves caused by small impacts is the basis for Low Strain
Dynamic Integrity Testing. This procedure is performed with a
Pile Integrity Tester (PIT), a hand held hammer to generate an
impact, and an accelerometer placed on top of the pile to be
tested to measure the response to the hammer impact. Given a
known stress wave speed, records of velocity (integrated from
the accelerometer signals) at the pile head can be interpreted
to reveal pile non-uniformities (changes in impedance).
Interpretation is usually done in the time domain (Pulse-echo,
or Sonic-echo) but data can also be evaluated by measuring the
hammer force and analyzing in the frequency domain (Transient
Dynamic Response). Pile length may also be determined. The
method is usually applied to concrete piles, concrete filled
pipe piles, drilled shafts, augercast (CFA) piles, and
sometimes timber piles. Usually the method is applied to piles
not connected to a structure, but good results are often
obtained for piles embedded in structures (such as cell-phone
towers, transmission towers, and even bridges). Application to
H piles, open-end pipe piles, and steel sheet piles is not
recommended. This method is covered under ASTM D5882.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| About
Dynamic Pile Monitoring |

|
|
Dynamic Pile
Monitoring is conducted during the impact driving of steel,
concrete, or timber piles to contribute to a safe and
economical pile installation. The most important results of
this test are soil resistance to driving, hammer performance,
dynamic pile stresses during driving and pile integrity. These
results can be readily used to formulate a driving criterion.
All results are obtained
in real time.
|
|
|
Dynamic Load Testing
|
| Dynamic
Load Testing is conducted independent of the pile installation
process. The test has as it's primary goal the
assessment of pile bearing capacity. It is applicable to
drilled shafts, continuous flight auger, cast in situ and
driven piles. The pile is impacted with a driving hammer or
with a drop weight. Field obtained force and velocity
signals are post-processed with the CAPWAP
program. This low cost test is an efficient and reliable
alternative to static load tests.
Dynamic testing allows contractors and approval agencies to
reliably test all types of deep foundations. The method even
works where static testing is impossible, such as on bridge
foundations on water, oil platforms and other near shore and
offshore sites. |
|
Dynamic Formulae
Attempts to determine pile capacity using
dynamic analysis date back to the 19th century. At that time,
a dynamic formula that considered the energy of the pile
driving hammer and the set of the pile was developed to find
bearing capacity. Dynamic formulae are still used today, in
spite of their inaccuracies and of the fact that they cannot
predict stresses during driving.
|
|
| |
|
|
Wave Equation Analysis
In the 1950’s, E.A. Smith of the Raymond
Pile Driving Company developed a numerical analysis method to
predict the capacity versus blow count relationship and
investigate pile driving stresses. The model mathematically
represents the hammer and all its accessories (ram, cap, cap
block), as well as the pile, as a series of lumped masses and
springs in a one-dimensional analysis. The soil response for
each pile segment is modeled as viscoelastic-plastic.
|
 |
|
All components of the system are thus
realistically modeled. The analysis begins with the hammer ram
falling and attaining an initial velocity at impact. This
method is the best technique for predicting the relationship
of pile capacity and blow counts (or set per blow), and the
only method available to predict driving stresses.
Improvements to Smith’s method include work by GRL to
incorporate a thermodynamic diesel hammer model and residual
stresses. The GRL Wave Equation Analysis of Piles (GLRWEAP)
program is based on Smith’s method.
The wave equation approach it is an
excellent predictive tool for analysis of impact pile driving,
but it has some limitations. These are mainly due to
uncertainties in quantifying some of the required inputs, such
as actual hammer performance and soil parameters.
|
|
|
| |
|
High Strain Dynamic Testing
When a hammer or drop weight strikes the
top of a foundation, a compressive stress wave travels down
its shaft at a speed c, which is a function of the elastic
modulus E and mass density. The impact induces a force F and a
particle velocity v at the top of the foundation. The force is
computed by multiplying the measured signals from a pair of
strain transducers attached near the top of the pile by the
pile area and modules. The velocity measurement is obtained by
integrating signals from a pair of accelerometers also
attached near the top of the pile. Strain transducers and
accelerometers are connected to a Pile Driving Analyzer®
(PDA), for signal processing and results.
As long as the wave travels in one
direction, force and velocity are proportional:
F = Zv,
where:
Z = EA/c is the pile impedance
E is the pile material modulus
of elasticity
A is the cross sectional area of
the pile
c is the material wave speed at
which the wave front travels
Soil resistance forces along the shaft and
at the toe cause wave reflections that travel and are felt at
the top of the foundation. The times at which these
reflections arrive at the pile top are related to their
location along the shaft. The measured force and velocity near
the pile top thus provide necessary and sufficient information
to estimate soil resistance and its distribution.
Total soil resistance computed by the PDA
includes both static and viscous components. The static
resistance can be obtained by subtracting the dynamic
component from the total soil resistance. The dynamic
component is computed as the product of the pile velocity
times a soil parameter called the Damping Factor. The damping
factor is an input to the PDA and is related to soil grain
size.
The energy delivered to the pile is
directly computed as the work done on the pile from the
integral of force times incremental displacement ( ∫Fdu
) which is easily evaluated as force times velocity integrated
over time ( ∫Fvdt ). Maximum compression stresses at the
pile top come directly from the measurements. The measurements
also allow direct computation of the compression stress at the
pile toe and the tension stresses along the shaft. Pile
integrity can be evaluated by inspecting the measurements for
early tension returns (caused by pile damage) prior to the
reflection from the pile toe; lack of such reflections assures
a pile with no defects.
High Strain Dynamic Testing encompasses
Dynamic Pile Monitoring and Dynamic Load Testing. Both are
covered by ASTM D4945. Pile Driving Monitoring consists of
using a PDA to perform real time evaluation of Case Method
capacity, energy transfer, driving stresses and pile integrity
for every blow. Dynamic Load Testing involves another
technique that evolved from Smith’s approach of modeling the
wave propagation theory of pile driving, the Case Pile Wave
Analysis Program (CAPWAP®).
CAPWAP combines field measurements (obtained with the PDA) and
wave-equation type analytical procedures to predict soil
behavior including static-load capacity, soil resistance
distribution, pile soil load transfer characteristics, soil
damping and quake values, and pile load versus movement plots
(e.g. a simulated static load test). CAPWAP analysis is made
on the PDA data after the test is complete.
|
|
PDA
Model PAK
Strain
transducer and accelerometer mounted on a pile.
Underwater
strain transducer and accelerometer mounted on pile.
|
| Back
to top |
|
| |
|
|
|
Whitaker Lab |
Services
| Professional Engineers
Environmental Services |
Senior Lab Technicians | Professional Geologist |
|